Posts Tagged ‘ criminal procedure ’

For Taiwanese, the mainland remains a dangerous place

Sep 4th, 2012 | By | Category: Jerome A. Cohen's Blog, News, Publications

Going to the Chinese mainland can be dangerous. First-time visitors are often surprised at their freedom, and seasoned travelers may feel comfortable, but foreigners in China do get detained by police for many reasons. When commercial dealings sour. business people of Chinese descent, including those from Taiwan and Hong Kong, are especially at risk.



BO XILAI, CRIMINAL JUSTICE AND CHINA’S LEADERSHIP

Mar 23rd, 2012 | By | Category: Jerome A. Cohen's Blog, Publications

Last week, within twenty-four hours, China’s National People’s Congress enacted a revised Criminal Procedure Law and its Communist Party ousted a rising political star. Superficially, the two Beijing events seemed unconnected. Yet they are linked.



Jerome Cohen on latest Criminal Procedure Law draft

Mar 9th, 2012 | By | Category: Features, Spotlight

On Thursday, March 8, 2012, the revised draft of the criminal procedure law was formally introduced to the national legislature in China, including stricter revisions that restrict the police’s power to secretly detain people–at least on paper. Professor Cohen’s commentary is available here.



Excluded : The Zhang Guoxi Case

Oct 9th, 2011 | By | Category: Spotlight

Normally, ‘dog bites man’ is not news, but in the generally bleak climate for reform that pervades China’s criminal justice system, a story of “judge upholds law” has gained some traction in the Chinese media.



Chance and Challenge for Chinese Criminal Procedure Law Reform

Sep 30th, 2011 | By | Category: Spotlight

Two weeks ago, a draft of the amendment to Criminal Procedure Law was posted on the website of the National People’s Congress to solicit public comments. This is the first time that the legislature has invited the general public to comment on a proposed amendment to such a major criminal procedure legislation. On Sept. 13 and Sept. 19, 2011, Professor Guo gave two presentations at NYU with comments on the draft, discussing both positive developments and potential problems in the amendment.