THE SHANGHAI COMMUNIQUE FORTY YEARS LATER: A JOB WELL DONEFeb 22nd, 2012 | By USAsialawNYU | Category: Jerome A. Cohen's Blog, Publications Printable format
This article was first published with some editing in the South China Morning Post on February 22, 2012 under the title “Deft Moves.” It was published in Chinese in the China Times (Taiwan) on February 23, 2012. Illustration from SCMP.
Just forty years ago, President Richard Nixon arrived in Beijing for what he immodestly but accurately called “the week that changed the world”. Knowledgeable observers knew that the success of the visit – so crucial to Nixon’s 1972 re-election campaign – would turn on how he and his national security advisor, Henry Kissinger, dealt with the status of Taiwan. That question had been central to Sino-American relations since the Communist victory in the Chinese civil war and establishment of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, and it continues to be today.
For over two decades following the start of the Korean conflict in June 1950, the U.S. denied that Taiwan was part of China. Yet that had not been the original American position after World War II. During the war, in the 1943 Cairo Declaration, the U.S., the United Kingdom and China had promised that Japan, which had forced China to cede Taiwan to it in 1895, would have to return the island to China at war’s end. Thus, in October 1945, the victorious Allies authorized Chiang Kai-shek, then president of the Republic of China, to accept Japan’s surrender on the island.
Chiang, without waiting for any peace treaty to formalize the island’s return, then reintegrated Taiwan into China’s political system. By the fall of 1949, Chiang’s government, after being defeated by the forces of Mao Zedong on the Mainland, had made Taiwan its last refuge against the Communist revolution, and Mao was preparing an assault on the island that was to complete the revolution.
In the United States, the Truman Administration, which was under severe domestic political attack from the Republican Party opposition for supposedly having “lost China” to communism, was deliberating how to respond to demands that it prevent the impending Maoist onslaught by interposing the Seventh Fleet in the Taiwan Strait. After an agonizing and acrimonious national debate, in January 1950 President Harry Truman and Secretary of State Dean Acheson, in successive speeches, announced that the U.S. would not intervene. To do so, they said, would involve the U.S. in China’s civil war and be seen as interference with the territorial integrity of an Asian state.
They based their decision on the premise that Taiwan had again become part of China, despite the fact that its new status had not yet been formally confirmed by any peace treaty. As Secretary Acheson, an able attorney, put it: nobody “raised any lawyer’s doubts” when Chiang’s forces were placed in charge of Taiwan at war’s end. That, he said, had been done in accordance with the Cairo Declaration and subsequent wartime commitments.
Yet, less than six months later, when North Korea invaded South Korea, the U.S. interpreted the invasion as an attack by “international communism” not only in Korea but also against Taiwan and Indo-China. With no national debate, President Truman immediately announced that he had ordered the Seventh Fleet to protect “Formosa”, using Taiwan’s Western name, and, to justify their momentous decision, Truman and Acheson changed the American legal position. The President proclaimed that the legal status of the island was as yet undetermined and would have to await restoration of security in the Pacific, a formal peace treaty with Japan or consideration by the United Nations.
Nevertheless, although the U.S. thus cast doubt upon China’s claim to the island, it continued to maintain diplomatic relations with Chiang’s government as the legitimate government of China and concluded a mutual defense treaty guaranteeing the island’s security.
When Nixon and Kissinger landed in Beijing on February 21, 1972, that was still the U.S. view, anathema to their hosts, who had always maintained not only that the People’s Republic is the only legitimate government of China but also that Taiwan had “long been returned to the motherland”. As the Chiang government no longer controlled any indisputably Chinese territory except for two small islands off the Mainland coast and had just been ousted from the UN in October 1971, its claim to be the legitimate Mainland government no longer appeared to be a serious long-run obstacle to Sino-American relations.
The same could not be said of the status of Taiwan. How could the conflicting positions of Washington and Beijing on the key issue obstructing Sino-American rapprochement be reconciled? Would the U.S. again change its position, this time sacrificing the security of the people on Taiwan? Would Beijing show flexibility?
In the artfully-designed, if hastily drafted, Shanghai Communiqué of February 28, 1972, Prime Minister Zhou Enlai and Kissinger managed to foster rapprochement without actually disposing of the Taiwan problem or damaging Taiwan’s security. One paragraph, from that part of the document in which the U.S. unilaterally stated its views, was crucial.
Its first sentence declared: “The United States acknowledges that all Chinese on either side of the Taiwan Strait maintain there is but one China and that Taiwan is a part of China.” This sentence ambiguously implied either that all people on the island side of the Taiwan Strait regarded themselves as Chinese or, more likely, that others there were not Chinese. Yet it could have been relatively innocuous in itself, since it merely purported to take note of an asserted position.
But the next sentence stated: “The United States does not challenge that position.” Moreover, the paragraph went on to reaffirm the American interest “in a peaceful settlement of the Taiwan question by the Chinese themselves.”
The past four decades have witnessed many developments, including establishment of diplomatic relations between Washington and Beijing, severance of formal relations between Washington and Taipei, adoption of the Taiwan Relations Act continuing U.S. protection of the island and the recent conclusion of many semi-official cross-strait agreements.
While the meaning of the Shanghai Communique is still debated, one thing is certain. Its most famous paragraph cleared the path for progress that has plainly changed the world.
Some changes, however, especially the prodigious rise of China, Taiwan’s establishment of democracy and the rule of law, and increasingly interdependent U.S.-China-Taiwan relations, will, over the next forty years, make it even more challenging for political leaders to preserve both peace in East Asia and freedom for the people on Taiwan.
(Jerome A. Cohen, an NYU law professor and co-director of its US-Asia Law Institute, is also adjunct senior fellow for Asia at the Council on Foreign Relations. See www.usasialaw.org.)
OTHER POSTS THAT MAY BE OF INTEREST